MICHAEL LAWRENCE BEAUCHAMP v. RICHARD L. BEAUCHAMP

Filed 6/20/19 Beauchamp v. Beauchamp CA1/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

MICHAEL LAWRENCE BEAUCHAMP,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

RICHARD L. BEAUCHAMP,

Defendant and Respondent.

A152873

(City & County of San Francisco

Super. Ct. No. FM-17-387005)

Appellant Michael Lawrence Beauchamp, appearing in propria persona, purports to appeal from the denial of a petition he apparently has filed in the San Francisco Superior Court to obtain a new birth certificate. His appellate brief fails to comply with numerous provisions of the California Rules of Court and is largely unintelligible. The clerk’s record is missing many critical documents, including the very petition he filed in the trial court, and he has elected to proceed without a reporter’s transcript. Although far from clear, it appears that appellant may have been born in another state and seeks to disown his parents who he claims have abused him. In all events, the clerk’s transcript does contain his notice of appeal, which indicates he is appealing from an order removing his petition from the calendar without prejudice, and the court’s order, also included, confirms that is what the trial court has done. Such an order is not an appealable order. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1.) The appeal therefore must be and is hereby dismissed.

POLLAK, P. J.

WE CONCUR:

STREETER, J.

TUCHER, J.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Copy the code below to your web site.
x 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *