Case Number: BC627170 Hearing Date: February 08, 2018 Dept: 46

Case Number: BC627170
NICK FELTON ET AL VS DLMLA INC ET AL

Filing Date: 07/14/2016
Case Type: Other Employment Complaint

02/08/2018

MOTION – COMPEL RESPONSES

TENTATIVE RULING

Defendant/Cross-Complainant, E-Alternative Solutions’s “Motion to Compel Written Discovery Responses” is DENIED without prejudice to re-filing the motion on proper authority and in separate motions and only if the default of DLMLA is not entered as previously ordered. Combination motions are not permitted. See discussion

DISCUSSION

There is no generalized motion to compel written discovery. Defendant/Cross-Complainant must file separate motions and pay a separate fee for the motion directed to each set of discovery.

Further, this court has indicated by its previous order that the parties should proceed by way of default against X-Defendant/Cross-Defendant DLMLA, not by way of the usual discovery motion practice.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Frederick C. Shaller, Judge