LINE: 1 17-CIV-01353 NICHOLAS NORTHROP, ET AL. VS. LATU PARKVIEW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.

NICHOLAS NORTHROP PARKVIEW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
DWANA BAIN MARK C. CARLSON

DEFENDANTS, LATU PARKVIEW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.; JOAN LATU AND STEVEN GUY COULSTON’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS AS AGAINST PLAINTIFF, VANESSA BAIN PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE §§2023.010, 2023.030, 2030.290(C) AND FOR ADDITIONAL MONETARY SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,107.50 AS AGAINST PLAINTIFF, VANESSA BAIN AND HER COUNSEL OF RECORD, DWANA S. BAIN, ESQ. TENTATIVE RULING:

Defendants Latu Parkview Property Management, Inc. et. al.’s Motion for Terminating and Monetary Sanctions against Plaintiff Vanessa Bain, filed 6-7-19, is is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART.

The request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.

The request for monetary sanctions is GRANTED-IN-PART against both Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s counsel, jointly and severally, in the amount of $460, to be paid to Defendants within 15 days of Notice of Entry of this Order.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court. Thereafter, counsel for Defendants shall prepare a written order consistent with the Court’s ruling for the Court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312, and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in the action, as required by law and the California Rules of Court.

LINE: 2 17-CIV-01353 NICHOLAS NORTHROP, ET AL. VS. LATU PARKVIEW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.

NICHOLAS NORTHROP PARKVIEW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
DWANA BAIN MARK C CARLSON

DEFENDANTS, LATU PARKVIEW PROPERTY MANAGENIENT, INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DEEM REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS (SET 1) ADMITTED AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,274.00 AS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS, NICHOLAS NORTHROP, VANESSA BAIN, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD, DWANA S. BAIN, ESQ. TENTATIVE RULING:

Defendants Latu Parkview Property Management, Inc. et. al.’s Motion to Deem Requests for Admission (RFAs) Admitted, and for Sanctions, filed 6-7-19, is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART.

The motion to deem the RFAs admitted is GRANTED. Code Civ. Proc. § 2033.280(b).

The request for monetary sanctions is GRANTED-IN-PART against both Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s counsel, jointly and severally, in the amount of $185, to be paid to Defendants within 15 days of Notice of Entry of this Order.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court. Thereafter, counsel for Defendants shall prepare a written order consistent with the Court’s ruling for the Court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312, and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in the action, as required by law and the California Rules of Court.

LINE: 3 17-CIV-01353 NICHOLAS NORTHROP, ET AL. VS. LATU PARKVIEW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.

NICHOLAS NORTHROP PARKVIEW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
DWANA BAIN MARK C. CARLSON

DEFENDANTS, LATU PARKVIEW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.; JOAN LATU AND STEVEN GUY COULSTON’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS AS AGAINST PLAINTIFF, NICHOLAS NORTHROP PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE §§2023.010, 2023.030, 2030.290(C) AND FOR ADDITIONAL MONETARY SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,200.00 AS AGAINST PLAINTIFF, NICHOLAS NORTHROP AND HIS COUNSEL OF RECORD, DWANA S. BAIN, ESQ. TENTATIVE RULING:

Defendants Latu Parkview Property Management, Inc. et. al.’s Motion for Terminating and Monetary Sanctions against Plaintiff Nicholas Northrop, filed 6-7-19, is GRANTED-INPART and DENIED-IN-PART.

The request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.

The request for monetary sanctions is GRANTED-IN-PART against both Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s counsel, jointly and severally, in the amount of $460, to be paid to Defendants within 15 days of Notice of Entry of this Order.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court. Thereafter, counsel for Defendants shall prepare a written order consistent with the Court’s ruling for the Court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312, and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in the action, as required by law and the California Rules of Court.