Paul Feller v. Beth Grant

Paul Feller v. Beth Grant
Case No: 1383288
Hearing Date: Tue Aug 20, 2019 10:30

Nature of Proceedings: Motion Child Support

Petitioner’s (“father”) Req. for Order: Child Support

Attorneys:

Petitioner in pro per [“father”];

Marlea F. Jarrette for Respondent [mother]

Ruling: There is no response filed; there is no Proof of Personal Service filed on mother; the Court would have expected to see that in the file; there does appear to be “personal” and “mailed” service on mother’s lawyer; that is not sufficient in this kind of a case. Father needs to come prepared to tell the Court what legal authority provides for POS on counsel only.

Analysis

On 7/16 father filed simplified modification of child support RFO; set the hearing for 8/20; among other things he says is that his time share now is 43% but that “My son Paul Ryan Feller Age 16 and turns 17 in 3 months request to spend 50% of time with me (Father) beginning right away.” Also reports “I pay $3,000 per month in child support for my other son age 12, Kaden Paul Feller who I have 50% custody of and who is brother to Paul Ryan Feller. Both wish to be on the same custody schedule.”

He also states that there has been a significant change in his income but I could not find that established as he reports on his I&E that his income is at $10,000/mo.

He also states support should be set pursuant to “the attached guideline support calculation sheet.” But the Court did not find that “sheet” attached to anything filed.

Court’s Conclusions

There is no response filed. Unless counsel agrees to service the Court will require personal service on mother.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Copy the code below to your web site.
x 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *