Case Number: BC672092 Hearing Date: May 22, 2018 Dept: 85

Chevron Federal Credit Union. v. Adam Shideler, et al., BC 672092

Tentative decision on application for writ of possession: denied

Plaintiff Chevron Federal Credit Union (“Chevron”) seeks a writ of possession to recover a 2012 Eclipse Attitude VIN 5LZBF3432CR009931 (the “Vehicle”).

The court has read and considered the moving papers (no opposition was filed), and renders the following tentative decision.

A. Statement of the Case

1. Complaint

Plaintiff Chevron commenced this proceeding on August 11, 2017, alleging causes of action for breach of contract, possession, conversion, account stated, and money lent. The Complaint alleges in pertinent part as follows.

Prior to the commencement of this action, Defendant Adam Shideler (“Shideler”) entered into an Agreement with Chevron to finance Shideler’s purchase of the Vehicle. Shideler received the funds and agreed to repay them pursuant to the Agreement. To secure repayment of the purchase price, Shideler gave Chevron a lien against the Vehicle.

Shideler defaulted under the Agreement by failing to make the payment due and owing on July 15, 2016, or any payment thereafter. There is currently due, owing, and unpaid to Chevron the sum of $41,975.29. Chevron has demanded that Shideler surrender the Vehicle, and Shideler has failed to turn over possession of the Vehicle to Chevron.

2. Course of Proceedings

Proofs of service on file show that Shideler was served with Summons and the Complaint on August 20, 2017, and with the moving papers by mail on March 26, 2018.

B. Applicable Law

A writ of possession is issued as a provisional remedy in a cause of action for claim and delivery, also known as replevin. See Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro v. Schectman, (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 1279, 1288. As a provisional remedy, the right to possession is only temporary, and title and the right to possess are determined in the final judgment.

A writ of possession is available in any pending action. It also is available where an action has been stayed pending arbitration, so long as the arbitration award may be ineffectual without provisional relief. See CCP §1281.7.

1. Procedure

Upon the filing of the complaint or at any time thereafter, a plaintiff may apply for an order for a writ of possession. Unlike attachment, where Judicial Council forms are optional, the parties must use the mandatory approved Judicial Council forms in a claim and delivery proceeding. (Judicial Council Forms CD-100 et seq.).

A plaintiff must make a written application for a writ of possession. CCP §512.010(a), (b); (Mandatory Form CD-100); CCP §512.010(a). A verified complaint alone is insufficient. 6 Witkin, California Procedure, (5th ed. 2008) §255, p.203. The application may be supported by declarations and/or a verified complaint. CCP §516.030. The declarations or complaint must set forth admissible evidence except where expressly permitted to be shown on information and belief. Id.

The application must be executed under oath and include: (1) A showing of the basis of the plaintiff’s claim and that the plaintiff is entitled to possession of the property claimed. If the plaintiff’s claim is based on a written instrument, a copy of it must be attached; (2) A showing that the property is wrongfully detained by the defendant, how the defendant came into possession of it, and, the reasons for the detention based on the plaintiff’s best knowledge, information, and belief; (3) A specific description of the property and statement of its value; (4) The location of the property according to the plaintiff’s best knowledge, information, and belief. If the property, or some part of it, is within a private place which may have to be entered to take possession, a showing of probable cause to believe that the property is located there; and (5) A statement that the property has not been taken for (a) a tax, assessment, or fine, pursuant to a statute, or (b) an execution against the plaintiff’s property. Alternatively, a statement that if the property was seized for one of these purposes, it is by statute exempt from such seizure. CCP §512.010(b).

2. The Hearing

Before noticing a hearing, the plaintiff must serve the defendant with all of the following: (1) A copy of the summons and complaint; (2) A Notice of Application and Hearing; and (3) A copy of the application and any supporting declaration. CCP §512.030(a). If the defendant has not appeared in the action, service must be made in the same manner as service of summons and complaint. CCP §512.030(b).

Each party shall file with the court and serve upon the other party any declarations and points and authorities intended to be relied upon at the hearing. CCP §512.050. At the hearing, the court decides the merits of the application based on the pleadings and declarations. Id. Upon a showing of good cause, the court may receive and consider additional evidence and authority presented at the hearing, or may continue the hearing for the production of such additional evidence, oral or documentary, or the filing of other affidavits or points and authorities. Id.

The court may order issuance of a writ of possession if both of the following are found: (1) The plaintiff has established the probable validity of the plaintiff’s claim to possession of the property; and (2) The undertaking requirements of CCP section 515.010 are satisfied. CCP §512.060(a). “A claim has ‘probable validity’ where it is more likely than not that the plaintiff will obtain a judgment against the defendant on that claim.” CCP §511.090. This requires that the plaintiff establish a prima facie case; the writ shall not issue if the defendant shows a reasonable probability of a successful defense to the claim and delivery cause of action. Witkin, California Procedure, (5th ed. 2008) §261, p.208. A defendant’s claim of defect in the property is not a defense to the plaintiff’s right to possess it. RCA Service Co. v. Superior Court, (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 1, 3.

No writ directing the levying officer to enter a private place to take possession of any property may be issued unless the plaintiff has established that there is probable cause to believe that the property is located there. CCP §512.060(b).

The successful plaintiff may obtain a preliminary injunction containing the same provisions as a TRO that remains in effect until the property is seized by the levying officer.[1] CCP §513.010(c).

The court may also issue a “turnover order” directing the defendant to transfer possession of the property to the plaintiff (See Mandatory Form CD-120). The order must notify the defendant that failure to comply may subject him or her to contempt of court. CCP §512.070. The turnover remedy is not issued in lieu of a writ, but in conjunction with it to provide the plaintiff with a less expensive means of obtaining possession. See Edwards v Superior Court, (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 173, 178.

3. The Plaintiff’s Undertaking

Generally, the court cannot issue an order for a writ of possession until the plaintiff has filed an undertaking with the court (Mandatory Form CD-140 for personal sureties). CCP §515.010(a). The undertaking shall provide that the sureties are bound to the defendant for the return of the property to the defendant, if return of the property is ordered, and for the payment to the defendant of any sum recovered against the plaintiff. Id. The undertaking shall be in an amount not less than twice the value of the defendant’s interest in the property or in a greater amount. Id. The value of the defendant’s interest in the property is determined by the market value of the property less the amount due and owing on any conditional sales contract or security agreement and all liens and encumbrances on the property, and any other factors necessary to determine the defendant’s interest in the property. Id.

However, where the defendant has no interest in the property, the court must waive the requirement of the plaintiff’s undertaking and include in the order for issuance of the writ the amount of the defendant’s undertaking sufficient to satisfy the requirements of CCP section 515.020(b). CCP §515.010(b).

C. Analysis

Plaintiff Chevron seeks a writ of possession to recover the Vehicle from Defendant Shideler. Shideler has not opposed the application.

Chevron presents evidence that on November 15, 2012, Shideler entered into the Agreement with Chevron in order to finance Shideler’s purchase of the Vehicle. Ho Decl. ¶9, Ex. 1. Pursuant to the Agreement, Chevron was granted a security interest in the Vehicle. Ho Decl. ¶11, Ex. 2.

Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Shideler was required to pay Chevron $49,999.59 with an annual interest rate of 5.74% by making 119 monthly payments of $548.61 beginning on December 15, 2012. Ho Decl. ¶10, Ex. 1. Shideler breached the Agreement by failing to make the payment due and owing on July 15, 2016, or any payments thereafter. Ho Decl. ¶15. Although Chevron demanded the return of the Vehicle, Shideler has refused to surrender it. Ho Decl. ¶18.

The amount due and owing under the Agreement is $41,975.29. Ho Decl. ¶16. The market value of the Vehicle is $17,220.00. Ho Decl. ¶19, Ex. 3. Because the amount Shideler owes exceeds the value of the Vehicle, Shideler has no interest in it. CCP §515.010(a). The need for an undertaking is therefore waived.

Chevron fails to assert in its application and declaration where the Vehicle is located. An application for writ of possession must include a statement of the location of the property and, if located within a private place, a showing that there is probable cause to believe that the property is located there. CCP §512.010(b). This defect is dispositive.

The application for writ of possession is denied.

[1] If the court denies the plaintiff’s application for a writ of possession, any TRO must be dissolved. CCP §513.010(c).