3rd Appellate District

Court data last updated: 12/27/2019 12:46 PM
Docket (Register of Actions)
Gonzales et al. v. Silverhawk, Inc., et al.
Case Number C083810
Date Description Notes

01/04/2017 Notice of appeal lodged/received. Filed in the trial court on 12/29/16.

01/19/2017 Letter to counsel – 10 days to file case information statement. CCIS and AMS due: 01/30/17

01/19/2017 Respondent’s mediation statement filed. Gonzales’s RMS due 10 days after AMS.

01/19/2017 Respondent notified re CAMS. Virk’s RMS due 10 days after AMS.

02/09/2017 Appellant’s mediation statement filed.

02/09/2017 Civil case information statement filed.

02/14/2017 Respondent’s mediation statement filed. Respondent Gonzales’

02/16/2017 Respondent’s mediation statement filed. Respondent Virk’s

03/15/2017 Case ordered not eligible for mediation. BUTZ, Acting P.J.

03/15/2017 Letter sent to counsel re: Appeal not selected for mediation.

04/03/2017 Notice of appeal lodged/received. filed in the trial court 03/29/17 by Silverhawk, Inc., Kamal Kapoor and Sunita Kapoor. Attorneys fees, etc.

04/05/2017 Letter to counsel – 10 days to file case information statement.

03/29/2017 Appellant’s notice designating record on appeal filed in trial court on: 03/27/17. Designating an Appendix only.

06/05/2017 Requested – extension of time.

06/05/2017 Granted – extension of time.

10/16/2017 Appellant notified re failure to timely file opening brief. AOB and appendix due: 10/31/2017.

11/01/2017 Returned document for non-conformance. Appellant’s AOB and Appendix are being rejected for the following deficiencies in the California Rules of Court and Local Rule 5: 1. No bookmarks on the AOB or Appendixes, 2. Indexes for the appendix are not in compliance with rule 8.144(b) and Local Rule 5, 3. Appendix volumes are missing cover sheet as required by rule 8.124 (d) and Local Rule 5, 4. Missing service of the AOB on the trial per rule 8.212 (c), 5. AOB is missing the Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons as required by rule 8.208, 6. Word count should reference rule 8.204(c). Corrected AOB and Appendixes are to be re-served and filed with this court by: 11/8/17.

11/14/2017 Returned document for non-conformance. AOB rejected pursuant to telephone conversation with counsel for appellant. Now due: 11/21/17

11/14/2017 Returned document for non-conformance. Request for extension of time to file appellant’s appendix rejected pursuant to telephone conversation with counsel for appellant. AAO NOW DUE: 11/21/17

11/16/2017 Returned document for non-conformance. Appellant’s AOB and Appendix are being rejected for the following deficiencies in the California Rules of Court and Local Rule 5: 1. No bookmarks on the Appendixes, 2. Indexes for the appendix are not in compliance with rule 8.144(b) and Local Rule 5, 3. No proof of service on the trial court, 4. The participating trial court judicial officer must be on the cover page of the appendix, 5. Pagination required. Corrected AOB and Appendixes are to be re-served and filed with this court by: 11/21/17.

11/14/2017 Certificate of interested entities or persons filed by: appellant.

11/22/2017 Returned document for non-conformance. Appellant’s AOB and Appendix are being rejected for the following deficiencies in the California Rules of Court and Local Rule 5: 1. Indexes for the appendix are not in compliance with rule 8.144(b) and Local Rule 5. 2. Pagination required. Corrected AOB and Appendixes are to be re-served and filed with this court by: 12/1/2017.

11/22/2017 Letter sent to: Appellant’s AOB and Appendix are being rejected for the following deficiencies in the California Rules of Court and Local Rule 5: 1. Indexes for the appendix are not in compliance with rule 8.144(b) and Local Rule 5. 2. Pagination required. Corrected AOB and Appendixes are to be re-served and filed with this court by: 12/1/2017.

12/04/2017 Requested – extension of time. Appellant to 1/2/2018 to file AAO.

12/01/2017 Granted – extension of time. Appellant to 1/2/2018 to file AAO. RAYE, P.J.

01/02/2018 Appellant’s opening brief. Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant: Silverhawk, Inc., et al.
Attorney: Sunita Kapoor

01/04/2018 Appellant’s appendix filed. 1 vol. of 7 vols. appendix 171 pp. RB due: 2/1/2018.

01/04/2018 Appellant’s appendix filed. 2 vol. of 7 vols. appendix 172- 313 pgs. RB due: 2/1/2018.

01/04/2018 Appellant’s appendix filed. 3 vol. of 7 vols. appendix 314- 531 pgs. RB due: 2/1/2018.

01/04/2018 Appellant’s appendix filed. 4 vol. of 7 vols. appendix 532-735 pgs. RB due: 2/1/2018

01/04/2018 Appellant’s appendix filed. 5 vol. of 7 vols. appendix 736- 934 pgs. RB due: 2/1/2018.

01/04/2018 Appellant’s appendix filed. 6 vol. of 7 vols. appendix 935- 1036 pgs. RB due: 2/1/2018.

01/04/2018 Appellant’s appendix filed. 7 vol. of 7 vols. appendix 1037- 1160 pgs. RB due: 2/1/2018.

01/12/2018 Stipulation of extension of time filed:

04/02/2018 Respondent’s appendix filed. 1 Vol. (278 pp.)

04/02/2018 Respondent’s brief. Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent: Ricardo A. Gonzales
Attorney: Erin Elisabeth Guy Castillo
Cross-defendant and Respondent: Anthony Virk
Attorney: Daniel V. Kohls w/CIEP. No interested parties listed.

04/24/2018 Filed application and order of: Granted to 06/25/18.

06/19/2018 Requested – extension of time.

06/19/2018 Granted – extension of time.

07/24/2018 Requested – extension of time.

07/25/2018 Granted – extension of time.

08/06/2018 Appellant’s reply brief. Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant: Silverhawk, Inc., et al.
Attorney: Sunita Kapoor

08/06/2018 Case fully briefed.

11/29/2018 Filed change of firm name. by respondent attorney Ricardo Gonzales.

12/02/2019 Oral argument waiver notice sent. Requests due by 12/12/2019.

12/16/2019 Deemed submitted.

12/23/2019 Opinion filed. (Signed Unpublished) The judgment is affirmed. Respondents shall recover their costs on appeal. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.278(a)(1) & (2).)