Lawzilla Additional Information:
Per the San Mateo court records plaintiff is represented by attorney Teresa Maestrelli. From review of online records Lawzilla believes the final ruling actually increased the sanctions from those listed below in the tentative ruling, and $18,990 in total sanctions were made.

17-CIV-04322 LORI RIGELMAN VS. IPASS, INC., ET AL.

LORI RIGELMAN IPASS, INC.
DAVID T. WANG GREGORY C. TENHOFF

MOTION TO COMPEL TENTATIVE RULING:

Plaintiff LORI RIGELMAN’s Motion to Compel Further is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows:

 GRANTED as to Request for Production (Set One), Request Nos. 9-11, 17, 19-23, 26-27, and Special Interrogatories (Set One), Interrogatory Nos 21-26 (“me too” evidence). During the meet-and-confer process, Plaintiff agreed to limit the scope of these requests to information pertaining to conduct similar to the allegations in Plaintiff’s Complaint. Plaintiff also agreed to limit the timeframe from January 1, 2010 to the present. (Decl. Loh ¶ 7, Exhibit 3.)

 GRANTED as to Request for Production (Set One), Request No. 18 and Request for Production (Set Two), Request No. 57.

Defendant iPASS, INC. is ordered to serve full and complete, verified responses to the foregoing discovery requests no later than August 10, 2018. To the extent that any documents are withheld on attorney-client privilege or attorney work product grounds, Defendant is ordered to serve a privilege log pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. § 2031.24(c) no later than August 10, 2018.

 The motion is DENIED as to Request for Production (Set One), Request Nos. 24-25, 51, and Request for Production (Set Two), Request Nos. 58-63.

Plaintiff’s request for monetary sanctions is GRANTED in the amount of $18,090.00. Defendant is ordered to pay these sanctions no later than August 10, 2018.