Maria Gloria Flores and Jorje A. Ramirez Aza
Case No: 19FL00982
Hearing Date: Tue Aug 20, 2019 10:30

Nature of Proceedings: Req. for Order: DVRO

Petitioner’s [“Gloria”] DVRO filed in pro per

Respondent [“Jorge”] has not yet appeared but is apparently in pro per

Ruling: For the reasons set out below the Court wants to hear from Jorge in response to Gloria’s complaints and concerns.

Analysis: Judgment was entered on the marital status matters on 7/5; thereafter on 7/31 Gloria filed an application for a DVRO; she seeks personal conduct orders; 100-yard stay-away orders; record unlawful communications orders; testified that she filed the application to keep Jorge from coming to her house or workplace; divorce ends 11/9/19 and he is responsible for some debts; there are important documents he wants to continue receiving at her house but she does not want him to come to her house; he ignores her requests; he came to her workplace on 7/12/19 to talk about financial/ debts agreements; she said she was done talking or listening and walked out but he followed her; he stood by her car and continuing his talking; it was frustrating when he was demanding that she listen to what they had already talked about so many times; she wants to prevent another one of his visits and live her life away from his demanding attitude.

No temporary restraining orders were issued since the Court did not find the kind of abuse necessary to support a temporary DVRO. The Court wants to hear from Jorge about whether or not he will agree to leave her alone; if he will not do that, the Court will consider issuing a DVRO.

The file reflects that he was given notice by mail from the Court Clerk on 7/31. He has not filed a response.