17-CIV-00226 MARKOWITZ LAW GROUP VS. WILLIAM BURKE DOSTERT, ET AL.

MARKOWITZ LAW GROUP WILLIAM BURKE DOSTERT
AARON B. MARKOWITZ PRO/PER

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING POST JUDGMENT COSTS TENTATIVE RULING:

The motion for costs incurred in enforcing the judgment is granted as to the attorney service fees associated with writs of execution, abstracts of judgment and this motion, in amount of $275.

The motion is denied as to the fees for recording abstracts of judgment. Such costs are claimed by filing a costs memorandum. CCP §685.070. The motion is also denied as to the costs incurred in filing the motion to compel as these costs are included in the sanctions requested in that motion.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 is required as the tentative ruling affords sufficient notice to the parties. Prevailing party shall provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in the action, as required by law and the California Rules of Court.

August 22, 2018 Law and Motion Calendar PAGE 3 Judge: HONORABLE RICHARD H. DUBOIS, Department 16 ________________________________________________________________________
9:00 LINE: 2 17-CIV-00226 MARKOWITZ LAW GROUP VS. WILLIAM BURKE DOSTERT, ET AL.

MARKOWITZ LAW GROUP WILLIAM BURKE DOSTERT
AARON B. MARKOWITZ PRO/PER

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFIS POST JUDGMENT WRITTEN DISCOVERY AND FOR SANCTIONS TENTATIVE RULING:

Plaintiff’s unopposed motion to compel post judgment discovery is GRANTED. Judgment Debtor shall provide verified responses, without objection, to the interrogatories and requests for production of documents on or before September 7, 2018.

Plaintiff’s request for sanctions is also granted pursuant to CCP §§2030.290(c) and 2031.300(c). Judgment Debtor shall pay Judgment Creditor $1,965 on or before September 7, 2018.