SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
UNIFIED FAMILY COURT

PAUL MICHEL SAAB,
Petitioner

VS.

MYLE PAULETTE ZAGORSKY,
Respondent

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Number: FDI-16-786110
Hearing Date: February 13, 2020
Hearing Time: 9:00 AM
Department: 403
Presiding: SHARON M. REARDON

REQUEST FOR ORDER RE MOTION TO QUASH AND/OR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
DISCOVERY SANCTIONS
TENTATIVE RULING

Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the Court makes the following findings and orders:

1) Respondent’s counsel has informed the Court in her Responsive Declaration that all four subpoenas subject to Petitioner’s motion to quash have been withdrawn. Therefore, Petitioner’s motion to quash those subpoenas is moot.

2) Regarding Petitioner’s request for discovery sanctions, Petitioner’s counsel stated in her declaration that she was planning to submit a declaration of the fees incurred for the preparation of her motion to quash. No declaration has yet been filed. Therefore, the issue of discovery sanctions in connection with Petitioner’s motion to quash is continued to the trial date that will be selected at the 3/20/2020 status conference.

3) Petitioner’s counsel shall prepare the order.

4) Preparation of Order: If you are directed by the court to prepare the order after hearing – within 10 calendar days of the hearing you must either: (a) Serve the proposed order to the other party/counsel for approval, and follow the procedures set forth in CA Rules of Court, Rule 5.125(c), or (b) If the other party did not appear or the matter was uncontested, submit the proposed order after hearing directly to the court. Failure to submit the order after hearing within 10 days may allow the other party to prepare a proposed order and submit it to the court in accordance with CA Rules of Court, Rule 5.125(d).