LINE: 1 17-CIV-04209 ROGELIO CORTEZ, ET AL. VS. NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, ET AL.

ROGELIO CORTEZ NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC
MARK W. LAPHAM SHERI GUERAMI

MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES SET ONE FROM ROGELIO CORTEZ TENTATIVE RULING:

The Motion of Defendant New Rez LLC fka New Penn Financial (“Defendant”) to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, from Plaintiff Elenita Cortez (“Plaintiff”), is GRANTED. Plaintiff is to provide code-compliant responses, without objections, on or before May 30, 2019.

Although Plaintiff argues in opposition that objections are not waived if the failure to respond was caused by mistake, inadvertence of excusable neglect, the court may provide such relief from waiver of objections on motion. (See Code of Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.290(a), 2031.300(a).) Plaintiffs have not brought such a motion at this time.

Sanctions are GRANTED in the amount of $200.00, payable by Plaintiff, on or before June 20, 2019.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other notice is required as the tentative ruling affords sufficient notice to the parties.

LINE: 2 17-CIV-04209 ROGELIO CORTEZ, ET AL. VS. NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, ET AL.

ROGELIO CORTEZ NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC
MARK W. LAPHAM SHERI GUERAMI

MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS SET ONE FROM ROGELIO CORTEZ AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS TENTATIVE RULING:

The Motion of Defendant New Rez LLC fka New Penn Financial (“Defendant”) to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, from Plaintiff Rogelio Cortez (“Plaintiff”), is GRANTED. Plaintiff is to provide code-compliant responses, without objections, on or before May 30, 2019.

Although Plaintiff argues in opposition that objections are not waived if the failure to respond was caused by mistake, inadvertence of excusable neglect, the court may provide such relief from waiver of objections on motion. (See Code of Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.290(a), 2031.300(a).) Plaintiffs have not brought such a motion at this time.

Sanctions are GRANTED in the amount of $200.00, payable by Plaintiff, on or before June 20, 2019.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other notice is required as the tentative ruling affords sufficient notice to the parties.

LINE: 3 17-CIV-04209 ROGELIO CORTEZ, ET AL. VS. NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, ET AL.

ROGELIO CORTEZ NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC
MARK W. LAPHAM SHERI GUERAMI

MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS SET ONE FROM ELENITA CORTEZ AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS TENTATIVE RULING:

The Motion of Defendant New Rez LLC fka New Penn Financial (“Defendant”) to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, from Plaintiff Rogelio Cortez (“Plaintiff”), is GRANTED. Plaintiff is to provide code-compliant responses, without objections, on or before May 30, 2019.

Although Plaintiff argues in opposition that objections are not waived if the failure to respond was caused by mistake, inadvertence of excusable neglect, the court may provide such relief from waiver of objections on motion. (See Code of Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.290(a), 2031.300(a).) Plaintiffs have not brought such a motion at this time.

Sanctions are GRANTED in the amount of $200.00, payable by Plaintiff, on or before June 20, 2019.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other notice is required as the tentative ruling affords sufficient notice to the parties.

LINE: 4 17-CIV-04209 ROGELIO CORTEZ, ET AL. VS. NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, ET AL.

ROGELIO CORTEZ NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC
MARK W. LAPHAM SHERI GUERAMI

MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES SET ONE FROM ELENITA CORTEZ AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS TENTATIVE RULING:

The Motion of Defendant New Rez LLC fka New Penn Financial (“Defendant”) to Compel Production of Documents, Set One, from Plaintiff Elenita Cortez (“Plaintiff”), is GRANTED. Plaintiff is to provide code-compliant responses, without objections, and to produce all responsive documents, on or before May 30, 2019.

Although Plaintiff argues in opposition that objections are not waived if the failure to respond was caused by mistake, inadvertence of excusable neglect, the court may provide such relief from waiver of objections on motion. (See Code of Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.290(a), 2031.300(a).) Plaintiffs have not brought such a motion at this time.

Sanctions are GRANTED in the amount of $200.00, payable by Plaintiff, on or before June 20, 2019.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other notice is required as the tentative ruling affords sufficient notice to the parties.

LINE: 5 17-CIV-04209 ROGELIO CORTEZ, ET AL. VS. NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, ET AL.

ROGELIO CORTEZ NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC
MARK W. LAPHAM SHERI GUERAMI

MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES SET ONE FROM ROGELIO C. CORTEZ AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS TENTATIVE RULING:

The Motion of Defendant New Rez LLC fka New Penn Financial (“Defendant”) to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, from Plaintiff Elenita Cortez (“Plaintiff”), is GRANTED. Plaintiff is to provide code-compliant responses, without objections, on or before May 30, 2019.

Although Plaintiff argues in opposition that objections are not waived if the failure to respond was caused by mistake, inadvertence of excusable neglect, the court may provide such relief from waiver of objections on motion. (See Code of Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.290(a), 2031.300(a).) Plaintiffs have not brought such a motion at this time.

Sanctions are GRANTED in the amount of $200.00, payable by Plaintiff, on or before June 20, 2019.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other notice is required as the tentative ruling affords sufficient notice to the parties.

LINE: 6 17-CIV-04209 ROGELIO CORTEZ, ET AL. VS. NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, ET AL.

ROGELIO CORTEZ NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC
MARK W. LAPHAM SHERI GUERAMI

MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES SET ONE FROM ELENITA CORTEZ AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS TENTATIVE RULING:

The Motion of Defendant New Rez LLC fka New Penn Financial (“Defendant”) to Compel Production of Documents, Set One, from Plaintiff Rogelio Cortez (“Plaintiff”), is GRANTED. Plaintiff is to provide code-compliant responses, without objections, and to produce all responsive documents, on or before May 30, 2019.

Although Plaintiff argues in opposition that objections are not waived if the failure to respond was caused by mistake, inadvertence of excusable neglect, the court may provide such relief from waiver of objections on motion. (See Code of Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.290(a), 2031.300(a).) Plaintiffs have not brought such a motion at this time.

Sanctions are GRANTED in the amount of $200.00, payable by Plaintiff, on or before June 20, 2019.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other notice is required as the tentative ruling affords sufficient notice to the parties.