Ulises Rodriguez et al. v. Segundo Sanchez Espinoza

Re: Ulises Rodriguez et al. v. Segundo Sanchez Espinoza
Superior Court Case No: 16 CECG 03726
Hearing Date: None. See below
Petitions: (1) Approval of Compromise of Claim of Minor Ulises
Rodriguez;
(2) Approval of Compromise of Claim of Minor Allison
Rodriguez; and
(3) Approval of Compromise of Claim of Minor Shayla
Rodriguez

Tentative Ruling:

To deny without prejudice.

Explanation:

No explanation is provided regarding whether the Defendant is paying out of pocket or is insured. In addition, no records were submitted in support of the costs of counselling treatment. Also, a recent doctor’s note in support of the assertion that the minors are completely recovered is also needed. Finally, Item 21 requests permission to deposit the funds in a Los Angeles bank account. But, if the parents live in Fresno County, why is this money to be deposited in another county?

Before reapplying for an approval or hearing date, the above deficiencies should be addressed, corrected and filed with the court.

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a) and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subd. (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Tentative Ruling
Issued By: JYH on 02/21/18
(Judge’s initials) (Date)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Copy the code below to your web site.
x 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *