FRANCISCO ARMENTA VS MIKIRO AMEMIYA Docket

Case Number: BC589837
FRANCISCO ARMENTA ET AL VS MIKIRO AMEMIYA ET AL
Filing Courthouse: Stanley Mosk Courthouse

Filing Date: 08/06/2015
Case Type: Motor Vehicle – PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending

Click here to access document images for this case.
If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.

04/24/2018 at 01:30 pm in Department 4 at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
MOTION – COMPEL DEPOSITION

07/24/2018 at 10:00 am in Department 4 at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Final Status Conference

08/06/2018 at 08:30 am in Department 4 at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
OSC RE Dismissal(TRIAL)

AMEMIYA MIKIRO – Defendant

ARMENTA FRANCISCO – Plaintiff

B|B LAW GROUP LLP – Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

DOES 1 THROUGH 50 – Defendant

FORD WALKER HAGGERTY & BEHAR – Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

HAMED YAZDANPANAH & ASSOCIATES – Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

YEO FRANCIS – Defendant

ZAVALA MARIA – Plaintiff

Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)

04/17/2018 Reply/Response (IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF MARIA ZAVALA, ETC… )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

04/17/2018 Reply/Response (IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION, ETC… )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

04/11/2018 Opposition Document (PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF FRANCISCO ARMENTA;DECLARATION OF ARTURO PADILLA )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

04/11/2018 Opposition Document (PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF MARIA ZAVALA;DECLARATION OF ARTURO PADILLA )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

02/27/2018 Notice, Association of Counsel
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

06/26/2017 Notice of Ruling (RE: MOTIONS TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

06/22/2017 Order (re motions to compel discovery responses )
Filed by Court

06/15/2017 Notice (OF NO OPPOSITION TO DISCOVERY MOTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

05/19/2017 Motion to Compel
Filed by Attorney for Deft/Respnt

02/28/2017 Demand for Jury Trial
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

02/28/2017 Answer to Complaint
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

02/27/2017 Proof-Service/Summons
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

02/09/2017 Proof-Service/Summons
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

02/08/2017 Answer to Complaint
Filed by Attorney for Deft/Respnt

02/08/2017 Receipt
Filed by Attorney for Deft/Respnt

02/08/2017 Demand for Jury Trial
Filed by Attorney for Deft/Respnt

08/06/2015 Complaint

Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)

06/22/2017 at 01:30 pm in Department 93, Robert B. Broadbelt, Presiding
Motion to Compel ((4)MOTION’S;) – Granted

01/19/2017 at 10:00 am in Department 93, Randolph M. Hammock, Presiding
Final Status Conference – Continued by Court