Lawzilla Additional Information:
Per the San Mateo court records plaintiff is represented by attorney Albert Boasberg who is being sanctioned by the court. From review of online records Lawzilla believes the tentative ruling republished below became the final ruling of the court.

June 12, 2018 Law and Motion Calendar PAGE 6 Judge: HONORABLE JOSEPH C. SCOTT, Department 25 ________________________________________________________________________
9:00 LINE: 4 17-CIV-05501 TOM TANG VS. WAI CHI YU, ET AL.

TOM TANG WAI CHI YU
HAOHAO SONG ALBERT BOASBERG

PLAINTIFF TOM TANG’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT WAI CHI CORPORATION’S FURTHER RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS TENTATIVE RULING:

The unopposed Motion by Plaintiff Tom Tang (“Plaintiff”) to Compel Defendant Wai Wai Corporation (“Defendant”)to provide Further Responses to Special Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents as well as Request for Monetary Sanctions by Plaintiff is GRANTED.

The verifications provided with Defendant’s initial responses are undated, and therefore Defendant is ordered to serve completed verifications for these responses.

In addition, Defendant is ordered to provide further verified responses, without objections, to Special Interrogatories, Set One, nos. 6 and 7. The records provided in response to Special Interrogatories nos. 6 and 7 are illegible. Defendant is ordered to provide full and complete responses that comply with Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.220.

Defendant is also ordered to provide further verified responses, without objections, to Requests for Production of Documents, Set One, nos. 3-7, 9, and 15-17. Plaintiff is to provide a separate response for each request, and the response must comply with Code of Civil Procedure sections 2031.220 and 2031.230.

Defendant and Defendant’s counsel are ordered to pay sanctions of $1,260.00 to Plaintiff.

The verifications and further verified responses shall be served, and payment of sanctions made by Defendant no later than July 12, 2018.

Moving party is directed to prepare a written order consistent with the Court’s ruling for the Court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312, and provide notice thereof to the opposing party/counsel as required by law and the California Rules of Court. The order is to be submitted directly to Judge Joseph C. Scott, Department 25.