Ike Ray vs. Estevan Rodriguez

2013-00153820-CU-PA

Ike Ray vs. Estevan Rodriguez

Nature of Proceeding: Motion to Compel Special Interrogatories

Filed By: Vasquez, Oliver J.

Defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff’s responses to special interrogatories is
UNOPPOSED and is GRANTED.

Moving counsel is admonished because the notice of motion does not provide notice
of the Court’s tentative ruling system, as required by Local Rule 1.06, and does not
provide the correct address for Dept. 54. Moving counsel is directed to contact
opposing counsel and advise him/her of Local Rule 1.06 and the Court’s tentative
ruling procedure and the manner to request a hearing. If moving counsel is unable
to contact opposing counsel prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to
appear at the hearing in person or by telephone.

Although plaintiff’s notice of non-opposition indicates responses to defendant’s
discovery were served on 4/17/2014, this was after the present motion to compel was
served on 4/16/2014. Since a motion is under Code of Civil Procedure §1005.5
deemed made at the time it is served and since plaintiff admittedly had not provided
the responses by that date. this motion is not rendered moot by virute of serving
responses on 4/17/2014.

Plaintiff shall provide verified responses, without objections, to defendant’s special
interrogatories no later than 5/30/2014. To the extent plaintiff may have already
served responses in compliance with this ruling, he need not re-serve the responses. Defendant’s request for monetary sanctions is denied since the motion is not opposed.

Moving counsel is advised that where discovery responses (as opposed to further
responses) are sought, the discovery requests need not be included with the moving
papers. Proof of the discovery’s service is all that is required.

This minute order is effective immediately. No formal order or other notice is required.
(Code Civ. Proc. §1019.5; CRC Rule 3.1312.)

Item 6 2013-00153820-CU-PA

Ike Ray vs. Estevan Rodriguez

Nature of Proceeding: Motion to Compel Request for Production of Documents

Filed By: Vasquez, Oliver J.

Defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff’s responses to requests for production of
documents is UNOPPOSED and is GRANTED.

Moving counsel is admonished because the notice of motion does not provide notice
of the Court’s tentative ruling system, as required by Local Rule 1.06, and does not
provide the correct address for Dept. 54. Moving counsel is directed to contact
opposing counsel and advise him/her of Local Rule 1.06 and the Court’s tentative
ruling procedure and the manner to request a hearing. If moving counsel is unable
to contact opposing counsel prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to
appear at the hearing in person or by telephone.

Although plaintiff’s notice of non-opposition indicates responses to defendant’s
discovery were served on 4/17/2014, this was after the present motion to compel was
served on 4/16/2014. Since a motion is under Code of Civil Procedure §1005.5
deemed made at the time it is served and since plaintiff admittedly had not provided
the responses by that date. this motion is not rendered moot by virute of serving
responses on 4/17/2014.

Plaintiff shall provide verified responses, without objections, to defendant’s requests
for production of documents no later than 5/30/2014. To the extent plaintiff may have
already served responses in compliance with this ruling, he need not re-serve the
responses.

Defendant’s request for monetary sanctions is denied since the motion is not opposed.

Moving counsel is advised that where discovery responses (as opposed to further
responses) are sought, the discovery requests need not be included with the moving
papers. Proof of the discovery’s service is all that is required.

This minute order is effective immediately. No formal order or other notice is required.
(Code Civ. Proc. §1019.5; CRC Rule 3.1312.)

Item 7 2013-00153820-CU-PA

Ike Ray vs. Estevan Rodriguez
Ike Ray vs. Estevan Rodriguez

Nature of Proceeding: Motion to Compel Form Interrogatories

Filed By: Vasquez, Oliver J.

Defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff’s responses to form interrogatories is
UNOPPOSED and is GRANTED.

Moving counsel is admonished because the notice of motion does not provide notice
of the Court’s tentative ruling system, as required by Local Rule 1.06, and does not
provide the correct address for Dept. 54. Moving counsel is directed to contact
opposing counsel and advise him/her of Local Rule 1.06 and the Court’s tentative
ruling procedure and the manner to request a hearing. If moving counsel is unable
to contact opposing counsel prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to
appear at the hearing in person or by telephone.

Although plaintiff’s notice of non-opposition indicates responses to defendant’s
discovery were served on 4/17/2014, this was after the present motion to compel was
served on 4/16/2014. Since a motion is under Code of Civil Procedure §1005.5
deemed made at the time it is served and since plaintiff admittedly had not provided
the responses by that date. this motion is not rendered moot by virute of serving
responses on 4/17/2014.

Plaintiff shall provide verified responses, without objections, to defendant’s form
interrogatories no later than 5/30/2014. To the extent plaintiff may have already
served responses in compliance with this ruling, he need not re-serve the responses.

Defendant’s request for monetary sanctions is denied since the motion is not opposed.

Moving counsel is advised that where discovery responses (as opposed to further
responses) are sought, the discovery requests need not be included with the moving
papers. Proof of the discovery’s service is all that is required.

This minute order is effective immediately. No formal order or other notice is required.
(Code Civ. Proc. §1019.5; CRC Rule 3.1312.)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Copy the code below to your web site.
x 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *